[At-Large] Fwd: [council] Final Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures

Christopher Wilkinson cw at christopherwilkinson.eu
Wed Dec 9 17:38:53 UTC 2015


Good evening. Did the WG see this coming? I shall read the report.


On 09 Dec 2015, at 17:17, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:

> FYI the report is attached. 
> ALAC comments have, on the whole, been taken into account.
> Kindest regards,
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
> ALAC Liaison to the GNSO
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:	[council] Final Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
> Date:	Fri, 4 Dec 2015 23:15:30 +0000
> From:	Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>
> To:	council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Dear Councilors,
> Please find attached for your consideration the Final Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures, which is also available here: http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-final-issue-04dec15-en.pdf. You may recall that the Council requested an Issue Report on the topic at the Buenos Aires meeting in June 2015. Under the ICANN Bylaws, an Issue Report is a mandatory preceding step to a possible PDP that is initiated by the GNSO Council. The Preliminary Issue Report was published for public comment on 31 August 2015, with the forum closing on 30 October 2015. The Report of Public Comments received is expected to be published on 4 December 2015 and made available here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-subsequent-prelim-2015-08-31-en. 
> In preparing this Final Issue Report, all the public comments received were analyzed and, where relevant, incorporated into the Final Issue Report. The Report of Public Comments has also been added as a separate Annex. 
> The staff recommendation is that the Council initiate a PDP to consider and analyze issues discussed in the Final Issue Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures to determine whether changes or adjustments to the existing policy recommendations in the Final Report on the Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains are needed.  The outcome of the PDP may lead to (i) amending or overriding existing policy principles, recommendations, and implementation guidelines; (ii) developing new policy recommendations, and/or (iii) supplementing or developing new implementation guidance.
> The relevant motions are currently in preparation for proposal by a GNSO Councilor.
> If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
> Best,
> Steven Chan
> Sr. Policy Manager
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> steve.chan at icann.org
> direct: +1.310.301.3886
> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
> tel: +1.310.301.5800
> fax: +1.310.823.8649
> <subsequent-procedures-final-issue-04dec15-en.pdf>_______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20151209/0f707984/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the At-Large mailing list