[At-Large] Results Available for 17 December 2014 New gTLD Program Auction

JFC Morfin jefsey at jefsey.com
Sat Dec 20 06:30:21 UTC 2014 

At 17:24 18/12/2014, Edmon Chung wrote:
>I sympathize very much with the sentiment.
>Not only is ICANN "auctioning off "baby"", it has essentially decided that
>required policies for ".baby" is no different than ".shop"...
>The registry can make it a free for all, and not even really be required to
>respect the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
>Personally, I think that is wrong.
>Edmon

Edmon,

and others  serious, useful, common sense ccTLD and TLD mnagers: it 
might be time to start discussing the specification and the  new 
domain name marketing model in non ICANN/NTIA "IN" DNS Classes with 
the development of the Libre MYICANN Plug-in, the various GOVCANN 
plug-ins we may expact as well as the value-added probable CORPCANN 
add-ons (Google? Dyn?).

As far as I am concerned my own Libre Team (Cybaogora), our MYCANN 
development will start in January through a compaction of the DNS RFC 
read in a user context with his/her Home-Root and "Happy-IANA". 
Experimentation using Bind has restarted for a few weeks. The tools 
for cross-collecting, sorting and publishing the TopZone are under 
various experimentalversions.

In despising our permissionless innovation effort ICANN tries to 
confuse this DNS architectural evolution with "alt-roots". I only 
continue to explore, test, develop and further deploy along the 
recommendations of the ICAN? ICP-3 document, development section.

In doing so it puts technology innovation and internet security in 
competition with their inteset and charter.
jfc




> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>[mailto:at-large-bounces at atlarge-
> > lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of parminder
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:53 PM
> > To: at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > Subject: Re: [At-Large] Results Available for 17 December 2014 New gTLD
> > Program Auction
> > n ?
> >
> > It really hurts deeply to my public and political convictions when a
>generic term of
> > language like 'baby' is auctioned off to the highest bidder for a certain,
>extremely
> > important, exclusive use. What public interest has been served here? Is
>there
> > anyone to ask this question? And I direct this question specifically to
>that part of the
> > civil society which the rest of the world would trust should be asking the
>questions in
> > the ICANN's context.
> >
> > Any trademark authority would have rejected out of hand if Johnson and
>Johnson
> > had sought 'baby' as a trademark for itself. The reasons are obvious. But
>those
> > reasons do not mean anything to ICANN, and perhaps neither to civil
>society groups
> > associated with ICANN.
> >
> > But the trademark authorities are expressly public interest bodies, under
>public
> > authorities, which are in turn subject to institutionalised public
>oversight and
> > accountability.
> >
> > ICANN on the other hand is a system captured by a group of people, who
>have
> > developed the perfect means and system to keep all those close by and
>powerful
> > happy in different ways - it uses the euphemism 'stakeholders' for them.
> >
> > Most of all, it keeps the big daddy, the US happy, by employing various
>means to
> > support its  reign over theglobalInternet - it keeps a boisterous IG
>circuit in play that
> > supports the status quo, and drowns out every other voice. This has been
>done very
> > effectively till now.
> > Btw, which technical governance mandate ICANN was pursuing to propose and
>set
> > up the World Economic Forum based new Net Mundial Initiative, which is
>simply a
> > way to divert global demands for addressing pressing Internet related
>public policy
> > issues. This is done directly to appease US government's political
>interest, which
> > ICANN has no business to be doing.. And then it keep the domain name
>industry
> > happy and prospering, and also other major industries.... This group of
>people, which
> > goes in the name of ICANN, does all this using the enormous funds that it
>illegally
> > collects as a tax from global public using the Internet. This is where the
>money goes,
> > and it produces conditions for further extraction.
> >
> > It is a sorry state.
> >
> > parminder
> >
> >
> > On Thursday 18 December 2014 11:18 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> > > How long that will continue/last will be a question to answer in near
> > > future.
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > >
> > > sent from Google nexus 4
> > > kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> > > On 18 Dec 2014 02:02, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
>wrote:
> > >
> > >> The money pile grows...
> > >>
> > >> -Carlton
> > >>
> > >> ==============================
> > >> Carlton A Samuels
> > >> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> > >> =============================
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    [image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
> > >>
> > >> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2014-12-17-en
> > >> ------------------------------
> > >> Results Available for 17 December 2014 New gTLD Program Auction
> > >>
> > >> 17 December 2014
> > >>
> > >> On 17 December 2014, Power Auctions LLC
> > >> <http://www.powerauctions.com/>, ICANN's authorized auction service
> > >> provider, conducted a New gTLD Program Auction to resolve string
> > >> contention for two new generic top-level domain
> > >> (gTLD) strings: .BABY and .MLS. Applicants for these strings were
> > >> unable to resolve contention among themselves; thus their contention
> > >> sets proceeded to auction, which is the method of last resort to
> > >> resolve string contention as prescribed in Module 4 of the New gTLD
> > >> Program Applicant Guidebook
> > >> <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb>. Subject to payment of
> > >> the winning price and meeting all other criteria for eligibility, the
> > >> winner will enter ICANN's contracting process to sign a Registry
>Agreement to
> > operate the respective gTLD.
> > >>
> > >> Six applicants participated in the auction for .BABY. Johnson &
> > >> Johnson Services Inc. prevailed with a winning price of $3,088,888.
> > >>
> > >> Two applicants participated in the auction for MLS. The Canadian Real
> > >> Estate Association prevailed with a winning price of $3,359,000.
> > >>
> > >> All proceeds from the Auction are being segregated and withheld from
> > >> use until ICANN's Board of Directors define a plan for an appropriate
> > >> use of the funds through consultation with the community.
> > >> More Information
> > >>
> > >>     - Auction Results webpage
> > >>     <
> > >> https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/auc
> > >> tionresults
> > >>> :
> > >>     Auction reports on this page on the New gTLD Microsite provide
> > >> additional
> > >>     information on bidding.
> > >>     - Auction proceeds and costs
> > >>     <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/proceeds>: A
>detailed
> > >>     summary of the proceeds and costs of all auctions conducted through
> > >>     November 2014. This information is updated at the end of each
>month.
> > >>     - Auctions schedule
> > >>     <
> > >>
>http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions/schedule-12dec14-en.pdf>
> > >>     [PDF, 253 KB]: Subsequent auctions are scheduled to occur on a
>monthly
> > >>     basis throughout 2014 and into early 2015. Auction events are
> > >> intended to
> > >>     resolve multiple contention sets simultaneously.
> > >>     - General New gTLD Program Auctions
> > >>     <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/auctions> information.
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> At-Large mailing list
> > >> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> > >>
> > >> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > At-Large mailing list
> > > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> > >
> > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > At-Large mailing list
> > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> >
> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> > -----
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 2014.0.4794 / Virus Database: 4235/8759 - Release Date: 12/18/14
>
>_______________________________________________
>At-Large mailing list
>At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
>At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

More information about the At-Large mailing list