[At-Large] [ALAC] Acknowledgment of Second At-Large Summit Declaration
sebastien at bachollet.com
Fri Sep 12 17:40:51 UTC 2014
Thanks for your question.
I am one of the 3.
(I don’t know what is public or not, then I will not put their name here and
talk on their behalf.)
And my suggestion was to add the following text:
and will study possible plans to make the At-Large summit a regular
May I suggest that in the work currently done by At-Large to « explain » the
declaration, to add the idea (request, demande…) of a regular occurrence of
ATLAS, as a conclusion?
Ready to answer other question and to help.
All the best
+33 6 07 66 89 33
Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
De : Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org>
Date : vendredi 12 septembre 2014 17:26
À : Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
Cc : At-Large Worldwide <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, ALAC Working
List <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Objet : Re: [ALAC] Acknowledgment of Second At-Large Summit Declaration
> Hi Sebastien,
> Thanks for forwarding this.
>> Note: Three voting members of the Board abstained from voting on the
>> resolutions. They stated for the record that they were supportive of the
>> work resulting from the ATLAS, but wanted to draw attention to their
>> encouragement for the Board to take future consideration of plans to
>> develop the ATLAS into a regularly occurring event.
> Could you please offer any more detail on this?
> Does this indicate that some of the Board members did not agree that the Board
> should just accept the ATLAS results, but also to confirm it as a recurring
> event? Or am I interpreting this incorrectly?
> - Evan
More information about the At-Large