[At-Large] News on the .health TLD allocation

[Evan Leibovitch]

The latter.

ICANN can barely cope with what it has on its plate today.

If there is a vacuum in International law, that gets handled by treaty, not
by a US nonprofit with no external accountability, that scrupulously shuns
all reference to it as a regulator.
 On Sep 2, 2014 7:37 PM, "Thomas Lowenhaupt" <toml at communisphere.com> wrote:

> Evan,
>
> Which is the fantasy - the vacuum or ICANN as the fill?
>
> Tom
>
>  -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [At-Large] News on the .health TLD allocation
> From: Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org>
> Date: Tue, September 02, 2014 4:58 pm
> To: Antony Van Couvering <avc at avc.vc>
> Cc: ICANN At-Large list <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>
> On 2 September 2014 16:52, Antony Van Couvering <avc at avc.vc> wrote:
>
> > The author also says, and it's relevant here:
> >
> > "But there is a vacuum in international law, and ICANN is in a position
> to
> > fill that vacuum,
> > ​"
> >
>
> ​That is fantasy, and fantasy is not relevant here.
>
> - Evan
> ​
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>