[At-Large] [EURO-Discuss] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process

Sun Apr 6 09:26:52 UTC 2014

Dear Tom,
>From the Report of the Working Group on Internet Governance
 
 
                     Château de Bossey
June 2005
Page 4
http://www.wgig.org/WGIG-Report.html

Sébastien Bachollet
+33 6 07 66 89 33
Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/
Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>


Le 06/04/2014 08:40, « Thomas Lowenhaupt » <toml at communisphere.com> a
écrit :

>Sandra,
>
>As a participant in the ICANN processes through an At-Large Structure,
>one representing individual Internet users, I'm curious about that
>"WORKING DEFINITION ON INTERNET GOVERNANCE." Where does it come from?
>
>Tom Lowenhaupt
>
>On 4/4/2014 12:29 PM, sandra hoferichter wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> for us to remember the WORKING DEFINITION ON INTERNET GOVERNANCE:
>>Internet governance is the development and application by Governments,
>>the private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of
>>shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and
>>programmes that shape the evolution and use of the Internet.
>>
>> Now that we have a concrete task ahead (IANA transition), we have to
>>bring this definition alive, more than ever before. The role of CS was
>>and is widely discussed, but it is still not 100% clear how this role
>>will look like in practice.  The kick start meeting in Singapore without
>>CS on stage was not the best start, but once can consider this a
>>cosmetic issue. However in the near future CS should be very clear on
>>how we think to contribute to the global process. We should work out a
>>concrete action plan (ALAC, NCUC, NCSG, ...) otherwise I fear we are not
>>heard.
>>
>> IGF-D took place last Wednesday in Berlin and the role of CS was the
>>hot topic there and I am sure it will remain on the agenda during some
>>other upcoming events (EuroDIG, ATLAS II....). Maybe we can consider an
>>answer (or thesis, message) on that matter as a possible outcome of
>>ATLAS II?
>>
>> My two cents
>>
>> Sandra
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>[mailto:at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Wolf
>>Ludwig
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 4. April 2014 17:44
>> An: At-Large Worldwide; William Drake
>> Cc: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang
>> Betreff: Re: [At-Large] [EURO-Discuss] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large
>>Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process
>>
>> Hi Bill, Evan and all,
>>
>> I agree with you that improved collaboration between ALAC, NCUC, NCSG
>>and "the broader CS community" or "how user-oriented groups are
>>institutionally siloed and whether some sort of pan-ICANN coordination
>>could be feasible?" would be an important issue for the ATALS II agenda.
>>As we defined some priority areas and subjects in Singapore and will ask
>>the Subject matter experts (SME) for some sub-topics on each, this issue
>>would perfectly fit into / under point 3 and/or 5.
>>
>> 1. The future of multistakeholderism  Adam Peake
>> 2. The globalization of ICANN  Rinaliah Abdul Rahim / Roberto Gaetano
>> 3. Global Internet: The User Perspective  Jean-Jacques Subrenat
>> 4. ICANN Transparency and Accountability  Avri Doria / Hong Xue
>> 5. At-Large Community Engagement in ICANN  Olivier Crépin-Leblond /
>>Mike O'Connor
>>
>> To be followed up during further ATALS II program elaboration and
>>tuning. Thanks and
>>
>> best regards,
>> Wolf
>>
>>
>> William Drake wrote  Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:55:
>>> Hi Evan
>>>
>>> I agree with your point re: a common agenda of specific policy issues
>>>being key to past successful dialogues. And we could indeed try to
>>>focus that way again if one wants. But actually I was responding to
>>>Wolfgang¹s broader point about how user-oriented groups are
>>>institutionally siloed and whether some sort of pan-ICANN coordination
>>>could be feasible.  Of course, that At Large is not only noncommercial
>>>users and is declaredly not a civil society network per se presents
>>>some complications there, but it still could be an element, if not the
>>>singular focus, of an agenda for a joint session.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4 April 2014 02:40, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> We¹ve had liaisons, joint meetings, and periodic informal discussions
>>>>> about 'the broader CS community' for some time, but the latter bit
>>>>>has not
>>>>> really progressed much.
>>>>
>>>> In my personal experience, things go well when there is a specific
>>>>common
>>>> agenda. Consider that the CCWG on Internet Governance -- an initiative
>>>> sprung out of the ALAC/NCSG meeting in Buenos Aires and co-chaired by
>>>> Olivier and Rafik -- collected enough steam community-wide to be
>>>>cited as a
>>>> reason for the dissolution of the Board Special Committees.
>>>>
>>>> I'd certainly call that a win. So we know it's doable.
>>>>
>>>> I find other areas of collaboration possible as ALAC starts exploring
>>>> privacy issues more (the Singapore workshop we held on TOR was
>>>>surprisingly
>>>> well attended and may likely be repeated). OTOH, I might hope that
>>>>NCSG --
>>>> at least some bits of it -- might find common ground with, for
>>>>instance,
>>>> the intense At-Large dissatisfaction with the utility and
>>>>enforceability of
>>>> Public Interest Commitments as they exist now in the new gTLD program.
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn¹t this be a worthy topic for some drill down discussion in the
>>>>> context of
>>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ATLAS+II+Draft+Agenda ?
>>>>>It
>>>>> would be of particular interest to those of us with feet on both
>>>>>sides of
>>>>> the lines, but I¹d think it¹d also be of wider interest as well.
>>>>>
>>>> Wolf is involved with identifying Subject Matter Experts for the
>>>>various
>>>> thematic sessions being done as part of the ATLAS program. Have a
>>>>talk with
>>>> him; there's room for this.
>>>>
>>>> - Evan
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> At-Large mailing list
>>>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>>>
>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>> ***********************************************
>>> William J. Drake
>>> International Fellow & Lecturer
>>>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>>>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
>>> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>>>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
>>> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>>>   www.williamdrake.org
>>> ***********************************************
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> At-Large mailing list
>>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>>
>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>>
>>>
>> EuroDIG Secretariat
>> http://www.eurodig.org/
>> mobile +41 79 204 83 87
>> Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
>>
>> EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation
>> http://euralo.org
>>
>> Profile on LinkedIn
>> http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig
>> _______________________________________________
>> At-Large mailing list
>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> At-Large mailing list
>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>_______________________________________________
>At-Large mailing list
>At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
>At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: default.xml
Type: application/xml
Size: 3232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20140406/a366d719/default.xml>