[At-Large] FRIENDLY REMINDER: Review on Trusted Community Representation #Root #Zone #DNSSEC [Call for Comments]

[McTim]

Hi,

There could be a funding mechanism set up by ICANN which would give TCRs
independence from ICANN.

See IO office for an example.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim




On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia at gmail.com> wrote:

> Salanieta, Oliver , all:
>
> I agree that the costs could be paid by others. The point was that ICANN
> will not pay because it is part of the ceremony and to maintain the
> objectivity of the TCR, which were not involved and witnessing part at a
> time.
>
> Regards
>
>
> 2014-02-07 22:24 GMT-02:00 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>:
>
> > Dear Sala,
> >
> > I am reviewing the Statement & very much like its early sections but I
> > have noticed a couple of things which probably need your attention:
> >
> > - In the response to Q4, the first paragraph starts with "That" and this
> > needs to be improved grammatically.
> > In the second paragraph of the response to Q4 there is a sentence that
> > needs cleaning up:
> > "There are 2.6 billion internet users should indicate that there are at
> > least sufficient persons in the world who could meet the criteria for
> > selection."
> > --> With 2.6 billion Internet users in the world, there should be enough
> > people in the world who could meet the criteria for selection
> >
> > - Answer to Q5: you mention that there are two points of view and I am
> > not sure that this is the case. What I understood from Alejandro is that
> > the TCRs should be cost neutral which in my understanding means some
> > organisation has to pick up the costs, whether their firm or whether a
> > third party. This might not be called "ICANN travel support", which is
> > what effectively I understood Alejandro to object to but could
> > definitely be some allocation that would make sure costs were paid by
> > the TCR.
> > Perhaps you might like to check this before affirming there's divergence.
> >
> > I am also concerned that we are not quite answering the questions in Q5.
> > The vote will launch on Monday 0:00 UTC - so thanks for looking into
> > this during the week-end!
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> >
> > On 07/02/2014 21:47, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> > > Call for comments close today so there is still time for those wanting
> to
> > > put make last minute comments. Visit:
> > https://community.icann.org/x/nge6Ag
> > >
> > > Dear Aida,
> > >
> > > Message below:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear Salanieta and All:
> > >>
> > >> Regarding the amount of TCR: Of the 21 TRC only must attend each
> time, 6
> > >> or 8 people, half of which go to a place and half to another. From the
> > >> point of view of those risks posed the biggest problem is that the two
> > >> places where ceremonies are are located in the same country: if
> > something
> > >> in there is no other backup occurs. But that is no reason the query.
> > >> Regards
> > >>
> > >> That's a very excellent point. Whilst I had drafted in case of
> > >> unforseeable circumstances, I can try to weave this in as well.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > At-Large mailing list
> > > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> > >
> > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > At-Large mailing list
> > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> >
> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Aida Noblia
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>