[At-Large] FRIENDLY REMINDER: Review on Trusted Community Representation #Root #Zone #DNSSEC [Call for Comments]

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Sat Feb 8 00:24:36 UTC 2014

Dear Sala,

I am reviewing the Statement & very much like its early sections but I
have noticed a couple of things which probably need your attention:

- In the response to Q4, the first paragraph starts with "That" and this
needs to be improved grammatically.
In the second paragraph of the response to Q4 there is a sentence that
needs cleaning up:
"There are 2.6 billion internet users should indicate that there are at
least sufficient persons in the world who could meet the criteria for
--> With 2.6 billion Internet users in the world, there should be enough
people in the world who could meet the criteria for selection

- Answer to Q5: you mention that there are two points of view and I am
not sure that this is the case. What I understood from Alejandro is that
the TCRs should be cost neutral which in my understanding means some
organisation has to pick up the costs, whether their firm or whether a
third party. This might not be called "ICANN travel support", which is
what effectively I understood Alejandro to object to but could
definitely be some allocation that would make sure costs were paid by
the TCR.
Perhaps you might like to check this before affirming there's divergence.

I am also concerned that we are not quite answering the questions in Q5.
The vote will launch on Monday 0:00 UTC - so thanks for looking into
this during the week-end!

Kind regards,


On 07/02/2014 21:47, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> Call for comments close today so there is still time for those wanting to
> put make last minute comments. Visit:  https://community.icann.org/x/nge6Ag
> Dear Aida,
> Message below:
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear Salanieta and All:
>> Regarding the amount of TCR: Of the 21 TRC only must attend each time, 6
>> or 8 people, half of which go to a place and half to another. From the
>> point of view of those risks posed the biggest problem is that the two
>> places where ceremonies are are located in the same country: if something
>> in there is no other backup occurs. But that is no reason the query.
>> Regards
>> That's a very excellent point. Whilst I had drafted in case of
>> unforseeable circumstances, I can try to weave this in as well.
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

More information about the At-Large mailing list