[At-Large] [APAC-Discuss] FRIENDLY REMINDER: Review on Trusted Community Representation #Root #Zone #DNSSEC [Call for Comments]
sala at pasifikanexus.nu
Tue Feb 4 20:26:58 UTC 2014
Many thanks Aida for taking the time to send your thoughts. It is much
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Salanieta:
> I was unable to add my comments on the wiki because the editor does not
> load, although I tried several times.
> My comment was sent yesterday LACRALO <
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> list in spanish, and I copy this
> below, with a variant cleared on that list in another mail, in which I
> send it deleted the wrong paragraph .
> Best Regards
> I agree with the draft Salanieta with the observations made by Olivier ,
> except the issue of financing , which I agree with Alexander. The word "
> sacred " could be changed to " solemn " because it is a solemnity and
> compliance is an essential requirement in the process of KSK .
> Responsibility regarding the control of TCR , which mentions Alexander on
> ensuring transparency , accountability , and defending the Internet users,
> and is set to generic point 9 of the Statement of Commitment between the
> Department of Commerce U.S. and ICANN , (the first document cited by
> Salanieta ) .
> Moreover, the entire process of the ceremony itself is a guarantee of
> transparency and protection of users . There are strict controls and
> detailed in the DNSSEC Practice Statement of the procedure for
> accreditation of entry of persons, etc., for the Root Zone Operator (TCR )
> , your responsibilities are established and each of the steps you must
> follow what is proper documents governing safety at these levels of the
> There are also prerequisites for the selection and appointment of the TCR
> , instructions for its function.That's part of the technical process of the
> company Verisign , specialist in informatic security .
> As for the number of TCR , understand that it is reasonable and who
> applied for the position, must know and accept their demands were selected
> according to rules and monitored compliance with requirements and is
> scheduled for the 21 selected will be appointed only some will setected ( 6
> or 8) for two ceremonies that simultaneously at different locations each
> year in four opportunities . The amount would be more to cover possible
> Regarding see major funding strictly maintain the independence of the
> process being controlled , between those who are appointed to control the
> process and who is responsible of it, in these last ICANN. This, besides
> exposing Alexander and there are many whose travel costs that could and
> perhaps should be without, given the possibility of remote participation ,
> which is not the case of the TCR , which have be physically present .
> 2014-02-04 Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <
> salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>:
> > Dear All,
> > The call for comments from At Large closes on 7th February, 2014.
> > There is currently some difference in views on whether the Trusted
> > Community Representatives (TCRs) should have indefinite terms of whether
> > this should rotated.
> > Should TCRs continue to remain self funded or should they be funded?
> > There are also a few other important aspects of this that we would like
> > consult the wider community on before amending the draft. For those of
> > who have already commented, thank you. I am mindful that we still have
> > heard from others. Feel free to comment directly on the wiki via the link
> > below or by responding to this thread.
> > https://community.icann.org/x/nge6Ag
> > Your input into this process will help us finalize the Draft. May we have
> > your views please?
> > Kind Regards,
> > Sala
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <
> > salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > This is just a friendly reminder in case you missed it that there is an
> > > ongoing Review on Trusted Community Representation in Root Zone DNSSEC
> > Key
> > > Signing Ceremonies. Grateful if the RALO Chairs could also ask their
> > > members for their views.
> > >
> > > For the benefit of the general community at large and those who have
> > > entered the community, you would have been advised at some point that
> > > anyone in At Large can have their say on aspects of Policies either
> > > individually as you comment directly on the site to the staff concerned
> > or
> > > as we in the At Large community do it through the At Large channels by
> > way
> > > of the "Wiki" or through email discussions.
> > >
> > > If you would like to comment on the Draft Statement currently being
> > > developed by the At Large on this matter, visit:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you are finding that you have difficulties posting your comment on
> > > wiki, feel free to respond to this thread and post your thoughts. On
> > > wiki you will see that the Review Team had laid several questions for
> > > public and wider community. This can help guide your comments and to
> > have a
> > > fair idea of the areas that they want and value your feedback on. The
> > > Large will close the call for comments on the 7th of February, 2014 so
> > get
> > > your thoughts in if you want them factored in.
> > >
> > > In case you do not have a profile to enable you to post on the Wiki
> > (ICANN
> > > Confluence) - please contact At Large staff offline.
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Sala
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > At-Large mailing list
> > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> Aida Noblia
> APAC-Discuss mailing list
> APAC-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org
P.O Box 19179
Cell: +679 9974527
Tel: +679 3544828
E: sala at pasifikanexus.nu
More information about the At-Large