[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] outcomes from the gTLD Review Group re: drafting of possible objections to new gTLD applications

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Sat Feb 16 21:54:51 UTC 2013


Dear Dev,

thank you very much for this update. This is great work.
Kind regards,

Olivier

On 16/02/2013 22:30, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
> Members of the new gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG) considered the comments
> from the At-Large community as of February 8 2013 regarding the
> applications for
>
> .amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg),
> .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg)
> .health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg)
> .nyc (https://community.icann.org/x/CYJEAg)
>
> None of the applications raised any limited public interest concerns
> (https://community.icann.org/x/QAkQAg)
>
> gTLD RG members ranked each factor of the four tests for community
> objection grounds ((https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg)
> based on the comments and discussions. Based on these rankings, the
> following are the decisions by the gTLD RG:
>
> Re: .amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg):
> There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community
> grounds  for the application for .amazon
> given that the "detriment" test for community objection grounds was not passed.
>
> Re: .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg)
> There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community
> grounds for the application for .patagonia given that
> the "targeting" and "detriment" tests for community objection grounds
> were not passed.
>
> Re: .health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg)
> Objection statements on community grounds will be drafted for the
> applications for .health given that the four tests for community
> objection
> grounds were passed. The gTLD RG will attempt to put together the
> objection statements to the applications for .health in time
> for RALO review around 22 February 2013.
>
> Re: .nyc
> There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community
> grounds for the application for .nyc given the comments received as on
> February 8 2013 indicated that the initial objection concerns raised
> were being addressed.
> A late comment sent to the gTLD RG on 11 February 2013 was treated by
> the gTLD RG as being submitted too late for consideration.
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Dev Anand Teelucksingh
> gTLD RG chair
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
>

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html





More information about the At-Large mailing list