[At-Large] GNSO Council

Adam Peake ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Sun Nov 18 15:47:28 UTC 2012

Red Cross and IOC should never have been presented together.  If Red
Cross alone, expect it would have (eventually) gone forward.  If it
hadn't been an Olympic year, not sure the Brits would have taken as
much interest.


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Roberto Gaetano
<roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Any comment to the recent GNSO Council vote about not granting temporary
> protection to IOC/RC? Am I the only one who thinks that the next Board
> meeting will be hot (and potentially embarrassing)?
> Just for the record, I believe that Volker's proposed (but not accepted)
> amendment could be the basis for a compromise solution - while at the same
> time I maintain the point that we should not open the door to different
> categories of future reservations other than those already included in the
> guidelines until a PDP produces a recommendation.
> Cheers,
> R.
> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-council-20121115-en.mp3
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-council-15nov12-en.pdf
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/chat-transcript-council-15nov12-en.pdf
> (interesting to understand the issue Jonathan is facing before deciding that
> the vote was valid)
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

More information about the At-Large mailing list