[At-Large] US v John Doe 1 & Others [Defendants]

[Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro]

>
>
>
> None of the citations apply to IP address distribution, which is what
> I thought we were talking about in this thread.
>

Basically the context in which I was providing those examples are one where
to forecast how the Courts are going to rule on a decision, one has to
examine how the laws will be treated. The Council of Europe views IP
addresses as shared public resources to be allocated and managed in the
public interest.

I then pointed to the manner in which the ECJ approached the prioritisation
of rights and interests etc. The two cases that were provided show the
tests (Article 8) and are useful reading. Happy to skype and discuss at a
mutually convenient time and happy to hear your perspective.

>
> The EU does have some legislation about IP addresses not being
> personally identifiable data IIRC.
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>



-- 
Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala

Tweeter: @SalanietaT
Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
Cell: +679 998 2851