[At-Large] What ALAC said about new gTLDs in 2003

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Thu Mar 31 11:12:22 UTC 2011

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Christian de Larrinaga
<cdel at firsthand.net> wrote:
> and the 2004 to date experience has shown that expansion predicated on a registry sponsor model is not workable in the context of the assumption that a domain name = trademark. The IPR issue blocks DNS name expansion. All we are seeing is the same old names in new tld's.  Not a helpful situation when naming resources are needed to support billions of new users and devices in an IPv6 scale Internet.

These "naming resources" don't need to be TLDs, do they?


"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

More information about the At-Large mailing list