[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] GAC Scorecard Comments due by 25 March

Evan Leibovitch evan at telly.org
Thu Mar 24 04:33:45 UTC 2011

Hi Hong,

On 23 March 2011 22:14, Hong Xue <hongxueipr at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Evan,
> Many thanks for the added part on PDPDR. It is terrific.
> For substantive evaluation, I do see your point but still cannot go with
> GAC. No rule-making can satisfy all the parties and interests. We can only
> stick to our priority and focus. If at-large has to pick a side between
> trademark registrants and new gTLD applicants, I'd rather choose the latter
> if free speech and free flow of information are implicated by the
> trademarks.

OK. I've also noticed Olivier's endorsement of your position.

I've removed the substantive evaluation component from the 'endorsed GAC
position' list

- Evan

More information about the At-Large mailing list