[At-Large] RES: [Chapter-delegates] The Future of the Internet Governance Forum

Vanda UOL vanda at uol.com.br
Wed Dec 15 19:29:32 UTC 2010

As always, when we give space government gets it. Get the space back is
another problem. Hope we can get it.

Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
IT Trend
Alameda Santos 1470 – 1407,8
01418-903 São Paulo,SP, Brasil
Tel + 5511 3266.6253
Mob + 55118181.1464

-----Mensagem original-----
De: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Olivier MJ
Enviada em: terça-feira, 14 de dezembro de 2010 15:35
Para: At-Large Worldwide
Cc: ALAC Working List
Assunto: Re: [At-Large] [Chapter-delegates] The Future of the Internet
Governance Forum

Dear Izumi,

Thank you for relaying the information about the future of the Internet
Governance Forum.

On 14/12/2010 15:27, Izumi AIZU wrote :
> It will be great, still, if ICANN AtLarge community, or ALAC express 
> or join the protest. Essentially, end-users interests will or should 
> not be represented by government folks, and that is exactly what this
decision may lead to.

I personally completely agree and this is why I have relayed Wolf's calls
for petition.
Should the At-Large Community join the protest? I hope they will.
Should the ALAC join the protest and express its opinion in an official
communiqué? I am unsure whether this falls in its mandate.
I am already told that some RALO Operation Principles limit its activities
under the ICANN ambit.

This is why I would urge members and the community to sign the petitions and
to voice their concerns, but am unsure about having an official ICANN
At-Large statement.

Kind regards,


Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD

At-Large mailing list
At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

More information about the At-Large mailing list