[At-Large] [ALAC] ICANN staff repudiates community call for change on Morality & Public Order

Karl Auerbach karl at cavebear.com
Tue Nov 23 00:49:26 UTC 2010


On 11/22/2010 04:12 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> ...  The Board was given poor and
> in at least some cases, completely inaccurate source information upon which
> to make decisions.

This makes a compelling argument why ICANN board members ought to create 
a public, written record for every decision they make or refrain from 
making that includes:

    - A restatement and summary of the the perceived question and the 
issues being faced (the restatement helps to highlight ambiguities in 
understanding and interpretation.)

    - A summary or permanently available reference to the facts and 
other input used in the making of the decision (or in the making of the 
decision not to make a decision)

    - A listing of the criteria

    - A statement that exposes the logical path of the decision, weighs 
the evaluates the facts, measures those facts against the stated 
criteria, and measures, qualitatively if not quantitatively, the weights 
of the competing interests.

    - The conclusion

    - Reservations

I tried to do this when I was on the board.  It is not an easy thing to 
do particularly when one is exhausted after a long sequence of meetings.

A decent respect to the opinions of the public and to the historical 
record requires that this be done.

And even if non ALAC selected directors don't do this, the ALAC one 
ought to pledge to do it.

When I did it I tried to describe only my own actions and not to reflect 
on the motives, methods, or choices of other board members.

This kind of practice, were it adopted, serves several purposes:

   1. It would help mitigate the kinds of situations which you (Evan) 
describe.

   2. It would improve the transparency of ICANN decision making.

   3. It would give each board member who does this a timely written 
business record that could be used to support a business judgment 
defense should legal action be taken against ICANN.  (It is naive to 
believe that director liability insurance is an impenetrable protective 
shield.)

	--karl--







More information about the At-Large mailing list