[At-Large] Libya terminating unacceptable .ly domains

[Christian de Larrinaga]

At Large focus would be best served keeping ICANN within scope :-)

On 8 Oct 2010, at 13:53, Sivasubramanian M wrote:

> Dear Patrick,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Patrick Vande Walle
> <patrick at vande-walle.eu>wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:45:05 +0530, Sivasubramanian M
>> <isolatedn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Censorship has been around for centuries in many societies. First, they
>>>> burned books. Then, they jammed radio and TV signals.
>>>> Now, they filter the Internet. Nothing new under the sun. How to solve
>>>> that is another debate.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> How?
>> 
>> Dear Siva,
>> 
>> What I meant is that the issues of censorship, freedom of expression,
>> democracy, etc are mostly out of scope in ICANN, short maybe of those
>> related to objectionable TLD strings that have been debated for a long
>> time. Such issues need to be addressed in the more global fight for
>> human rights through other organizations. If I had the magic formula
>> that would stop censorship and reinstate tolerance and democracy, I
>> would gladly share it. Alas, I don't.
>> 
>> Patrick
>> 
> 
> Thanks. It may be out of scope in ICANN, but is at-Large, even though it is
> ICANN at-Large, limited to names and numbers?
> 
> Sivasubramanian M
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
>> At-Large mailing list
>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>> 
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> 
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org