[APAC-Discuss] Fwd: [ALAC] Final ALAC Statement on Preliminary Issue Report on ‘Thick’ Whois

[Charles Mok (gmail)]

Thanks Holly.

Staff please help set up a Doodle.

And, Holly, maybe it's good if you can recruit a couple more from our
region to be sure that you are not alone on this :)

Thanks!
charles


On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>wrote:

> Hi Everyone
>
> This is Alan's final email including a link to the ALAC statement on
> WHOIS.  As his comments make clear, this is just the first step.  The next
> steps will probably include a PDP - and a discussion in all the RALOS on
> the privacy issues this raises.
>
> But this was a good first step.
>
> What is next is the webinar (ICANN staff??) on WHOIS for those following
> the issue.  I know I put my hand up for arranging a time but
> Heidi/Matt/Silvia - probably better if ICANN manages sending out the
> Doodle.  And for those interested, please reply.  It will be good
> background for the ongoing discussions.
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Holly Raiche
> h.raiche at internode.on.net
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> > Date: 24 December 2011 12:18:56 PM AEDT
> > To: ALAC Working List <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> > Subject: [ALAC] Final ALAC Statement on Preliminary Issue Report on
> ‘Thick’ Whois
> >
> > The revised version of the statement based on comment submitted has
> > been posted at
> > https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=30345624.
> >
> > Aside from stylistic changes, the only two substantive changes were:
> >
> > - In sub-item 1, the intent of the statement needed to be clarified
> > as suggested by Eduardo.
> > - Sub-item 3 was added based on a comment I made early in the process
> > with no one disputing it.
> >
> > Of the other suggestions, they generally were:
> >
> > - counter to community input in the earlier round of e-mail comments;
> > - supported but did not change what was already in the draft statement;
> or
> > - were issues related to the substantive discussion of whether the
> > change from thin to thick should be made, the subject of the PDP if
> > one should be started, but was not required in this vetting of the
> > Preliminary Issue Report.
> >
> > If you have any concerns with this final statement, please contact me.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC mailing list
> > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> >
> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> > ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
> _______________________________________________
> APAC-Discuss mailing list
> APAC-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
>
> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org
>