[ALAC] Discussions on ALAC Positions on CCWG Recommendations

[Harold]

I agree with your point of view.
I don't have any objection about it.
I believe that this proposed action will enrich the discussion process.

Greetings

El 3 de febrero de 2016 15:27:38 GMT-04:30, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> escribió:
>One of the problems we have had is that when commenting on previous 
>CCWG reports, there have been two parallel discussions, one on the 
>ALAC list, and one on the IANA-Issues WG list.
>
>Currently about 1/2 of the ALAC and 9 regional leaders are not on the 
>IANA-Issues list.
>
>The traffic on that list is low. In January, there were 42 messages, 
>and 32 of those were related to meeting schedules, with only 10 on
>substance.
>
>Adding someone to the list makes it easier for them to attend a WG 
>meeting, but does not imply any obligation to do so.
>
>Is there any objection if we add those people to the IANA-Issues list 
>now? This would allow the important discussion on whether to ratify 
>or not on a single list.
>
>We could remove those who wanted to leave once the final decision is 
>taken in or before Marrakech.
>
>Alan
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki:
>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

-- 
Enviado desde mi teléfono con K-9 Mail.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20160203/d0e0828d/attachment.html>