[NA-Discuss] Opinions Requested
calderon.alfredo at gmail.com
Wed Jan 25 02:39:24 UTC 2017
As pointed out by most I do not understand the purpose or reconsidering something that the Committee in charge reviewed.
- Is new information not reviewed by the Committee available?
- What are the basis for considering him if we as a body are seeking new insights in the Board and other groups?
Just a new guy's perspective!
Sent from my "iPad Air"
Email: calderon.alfredo at gmail.com
Business card: http://myonepage.com/ acalderon
Twitter news: http://paper.li/ acalderon52
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Marita Moll <mmoll at ca.inter.net> wrote:
> I agree with Glenn and others. I don't support a vote at this time.
>> On 1/24/2017 1:21 PM, Glenn McKnight wrote:
>> In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
>> I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
>> I don't agree to have a vote
>> Glenn McKnight
>> Glenn McKnight
>> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
>> skype gmcknight
>> twitter gmcknight
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Folks
>>> Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
>>> The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree PASSIONATELY to expand the slate to include Sebastien
>>> In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community first on your views on this subject. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
>>> Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
>>> Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
>>> Opinions welcome
>>> Glenn McKnight
>>> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
>>> skype gmcknight
>>> twitter gmcknight
>> NA-Discuss mailing list
>> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NA-Discuss