[NA-Discuss] VOTE RESULTS: 2013 NARALO Secretary Selection
kierenmccarthy at gmail.com
Mon Jul 22 03:09:07 UTC 2013
I wish as much time, energy and effort had gone into informing us about the meeting you were paid as our representatives to attend last week in Durban as has been out into bickering about voting procedures.
[from mobile device]
On Jul 21, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> I presume that by "incumbent" you mean people in office such as the ALAC members or ALAC Chair (usually it is used referring to the person who is in office but is in a contested election).
> I guess our experiences are different. Certainly someone who is part of a current organization is familiar with the others who may be in a contested election. But KNOW is definitely not the same as TRUST and not infrequently KNOW is synonymous with wanting someone new. (And I am not implying anything about the people in the current election).
> At 21/07/2013 02:34 PM, toml at communisphere.com wrote:
>> What I am trying to say is that incumbents will better know and trust a known player. Amopholy (sp?), might describe the human response that Option 4 draws upon. There are both good and bad associated with this. Random is life.
>> T9m Lowenhaupt
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
More information about the NA-Discuss