[NA-Discuss] Opinions requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications.
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Mon Jan 28 22:09:55 UTC 2013
Of perhaps some relevance is the statement in the recent Board report
saying that they are looking at the issue raised by the GAC on how to
ensure that non-community applicants fulfill their intentions
outlined in their applications. Despite many such demands in the
past, the final AG did not hold applicants to their intent
implementations (as it does for community applications). The GAC does
seem to have been able to catch the Board's attention on this.
At 28/01/2013 04:03 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>In the case of .nyc we have a situation in which the city government has
>made a clear choice according to ICANN guidelines. While I am extreley
>symathetic to Tom' s original vision for .nyc and far prefer it to that in
>the existing application, it is hard to imagine an objection that could
>avoid forcing ICANN to get involved in New York's municipal politics.
>Objectively, a democratically-elected NY city council would be very
>difficult to second-guess as to determining relative community support of
>the two approaches.
More information about the NA-Discuss