[NA-Discuss] Opinions requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications.

[Hansen, Kenneth]

Thank you Evan.  We will keep the time constraints in mind, and submit comments prior to February 8th.

Best,
Ken

----- Original Message -----
From: Evan Leibovitch [mailto:evan at telly.org]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 01:24 PM
To: Hansen, Kenneth
Cc: NARALO Discussion List <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Opinions requested from the At-Large community on objection comments received on new gTLD applications.

Hi Ken,

On 31 January 2013 13:26, Hansen, Kenneth <Kenneth.Hansen at neustar.biz>wrote:


> Thank you for the opportunity to provide additional detail.   I greatly
> appreciate the effort to conduct thorough due diligence, "hearing
> objectively from all sides in a good-faith intent to investigate."
>
> There are inaccuracies, as well as facts and important background
> information missing from the posting.  Since the Application is the City of
> New York itself, I have reached out to them to discuss a response. Is there
> a deadline we should keep in mind?
>

You may not have time to defer. I am just now reminded that the Review
Group needs to make its initial recommendations whether to escalate the
received objections by Feb 8. Of course, even if the RG *does* make such a
determination, the issue still has to be debated and ultimately brought to
an ALAC vote.

- Evan
------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------