[NA-Discuss] Draft NARALO Operating Procedures
DThompson1 at GOV.NU.CA
Fri Aug 9 14:40:20 UTC 2013
Works for me!
Darlene A. Thompson
N-CAP/Department of Education
P.O. Box 1000, Station 910
Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0
Phone: (867) 975-5631
Fax: (867) 975-5610
dthompson at gov.nu.ca
From: Alan Greenberg [alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:49 AM
To: Evan Leibovitch
Cc: Thompson, Darlene; NA-Discuss
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Draft NARALO Operating Procedures
Within ALAC, we have moved to all other personnel-related vote being secret. NARALO is not obliged to follow suit, but that is really the question in my mind.
I would suggest that the rule be changed to say that in cases where there are more candidates than slots, it is the call of the chair whether to attempt consensus or go strain to a vote.
Would that work with everyone?
At 08/08/2013 10:40 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
Evan, were there ever cases where there were more candidates than slots and consensus was used? Alan
At 08/08/2013 04:34 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
On 6 August 2013 10:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> > wrote:
At 06/08/2013 08:31 AM, Thompson, Darlene wrote:
#12 refers to ALAC members being chosen by a rough consensus process. This has never been done. It has always been done by a voting process. The rough consensus wording should rather be used for routine decisions.
I am happy to make such a change if there is such a will.
I wouldn't say never.
NARALO's first two non-ALAC reps -- Robert and Beau - were chosen by consensus, no vote was ever taken. I believe that Gareth's selection as well as my first, were also done that way.
I would prefer to keep the option so to allow for the flexibility.
More information about the NA-Discuss