[NA-Discuss] [At-Large] Public Board Meeting - the Update for Prague

Garth Bruen at Knujon.com gbruen at knujon.com
Fri May 4 19:34:46 UTC 2012

True, no need for us to add pressure on the TAS issue, I'm sure staff wants 
to fix it asap as opposed other issues we've presented.

However, it is symptomatic and raises questions about the organization's 
staffing and ability to manage this technical expansion. Beau is right in 
that they started off sharing lots of info about the outage and then went 

From: "John R. Levine" <johnl at iecc.com>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 1:40 PM
To: "Evan Leibovitch" <evan at telly.org>
Cc: "NA Discuss" <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] [At-Large] Public Board Meeting - the Update for 

>> And since -- as I have been asserting all along -- there is no end-user
>> demand driving the TLD expansion, end users really don't care if the
>> process if interrupted, let alone why.
> Agreed.  The domain speculators don't need any help complaining that they
> have to wait for another month.
> I'd prefer that ALAC concentrate on issues that matter to the individual
> non-registrants that ALAC is supposed to represent and who have no other
> voice at ICANN (other than very indirectly via GAC.)
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for 
> Dummies",
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------

More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list