[NA-Discuss] Proxy-Privacy Use Higher for Illicit Domains

Garth Bruen at Knujon.com gbruen at knujon.com
Fri Mar 11 02:12:26 UTC 2011


Oh, I know what you meant. but you're talking about original intent and I'm 
talking about the de facto regime.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:11 PM
To: "NARALO Discussion List" <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Proxy-Privacy Use Higher for Illicit Domains

> Hi,
>
> I was commenting on the comment made in the article.
>
> Where you bluntly say that a system I think that is run for my benefit is 
> run for the benefit of criminals and spammers.
>
> a.
>
> On 10 Mar 2011, at 17:03, Garth Bruen at Knujon.com wrote:
>
>> Avri,
>>
>> I'd like to point out this sentence: "the illicit use of privacy-proxy 
>> erodes the legitimate use." I support the use of privacy services for 
>> proper reasons. The way it is structured now benefits the abusers and 
>> will likely cause lawful users to suffer later. I like the Canadian 
>> system (.CA) that prohibits the use for commercial entities, that would 
>> preclude much misuse.
>>
>> Your assumptions about my intent are not supported by the content of the 
>> article, it is I who have been painted by a broad brush.
>>
>> -Garth
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:17 PM
>> To: "NARALO Discussion List" <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Proxy-Privacy Use Higher for Illicit Domains
>>
>>>
>>> On 10 Mar 2011, at 09:23, Garth Bruen at Knujon.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> One of the controversial sub-issues is privacy-proxy domain 
>>>> registrations
>>>> which allow a registrant to replace their WHOIS details with the 
>>>> contact
>>>> information a of privacy shield company. The privacy-proxy business is 
>>>> a
>>>> nebulous world with no standards and little accountability. Supporters 
>>>> claim
>>>> it protects victims and political activists from attacks and private
>>>> citizens from getting spammed or scammed. Critics, like me, contend it 
>>>> is a
>>>> loose system run on behalf of criminals and spammers.
>>>
>>>
>>> cool.
>>> i am now a spammer and a criminal.
>>> your brush strokes are a tad bit broad.
>>>
>>> a.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------
>>> NA-Discuss mailing list
>>> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>>>
>>> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
>>> ------
>>
>
>
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
>
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
> 



More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list