[NA-Discuss] Video, real-time stream or delayed, with optional post-processing (was: quora)
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
ocl at gih.com
Thu Jul 7 23:11:09 UTC 2011
On 07/07/2011 17:51, ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net wrote :
> Streaming is good, it meets a specific need. However, it is also not
> accessible for those with (a) limited media access, or (b) limited
> context. This is where the post-processing issue is interesting. Rather
> than a meeting on an inscruitable subject couched in impenitrable
> language, a voice over and visual sequence could convey something that
> is accessible to a larger audience of interested persons.
> As a plus, the post-processing provides an opportunity for voice over
> in langauges other than English.
As a minus, post-processing costs money.
I think ICANN could run along an unmanned WebCam type streaming scenario
for the time being because its costs would be nominal. Anything more
than that is unlikely at this stage.
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
More information about the NA-Discuss