[NA-Discuss] [ALAC] Fwd: Re: Draft letter to House Energy & Commerce Committee
langdonorr at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 17:09:28 UTC 2011
Thanks OCL I wonder though as you have gone to the second page with the
layout is it worthwhile inserting the ALAC and At-Large Structure diagram
as a easy to read and understand graphic on the last (2nd ) page below the
signature line as a form of 'appendix' You know pictures are worth a
<insert ###> of words rule...
On 15 December 2011 04:00, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
> there has recently been discussion on the NARALO list, regarding
> hearings taking place in the US, including a hearing by the Senate
> Committee on Science, Energy & Transportation (held Dec 8) and a hearing
> by the House of Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee (held on Dec
> 14th -- i.e. today).
> Evan has kindly explained what these are and how they can accept
> comments, with clear links to the hearings. His message is included below.
> Please find enclosed, a draft of the first letter from Beau Brendler,
> NARALO Chair and co-signed by me, Chair of the ALAC, to be sent to the
> Senate Committee by closing of business day today. It will be sent via
> two paths, to the Chair of the Committee, John D. (Jay) Rockefeller.
> Since this draft letter is not a policy paper or ALAC Statement but
> rather a letter to tell the Senate "you wish to see end user input in
> ICANN, hey look, here we are", it does not require a formal vote, but it
> will be archived in our ALAC correspondence.
> We shall also submit a similar letter to Chair of the the House of
> Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee, Congressman Fred Upton,
> should this be required. I understand that Kurt Pritz will be one of the
> witnesses providing testimony in the hearing, so we'll have to see what
> gets addressed at the hearing and if a completion of information is
> required, no doubt that Beau and I would be happy to oblige.
> Kind regards,
> On 13/12/2011 06:49, Evan Leibovitch wrote :
> > An important point of clarification (brought to me by Amber Sterling
> > of the NPOC earlier today) about the deadlines.
> > There are two different hearings
> > 1. Senate Committee on Science Energy and Transportation
> > <http://1.usa.gov/vzddPH> (held Dec 8)
> > After the verbal testimony was given, the public is able to send
> > comments to the Committee by EoB Dec 14
> > 2. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee
> > <
> > (to be held Dec 14)
> > After the verbal testimony is given, the public will be able to
> > send comments (deadline will be announced at the meeting)
> > So... the letter Olivier has drafted is in response to the Senate
> > hearing (chair: John Rockefeller) and needs to be sent there before
> > Wednesday EoB. The letter mentions Esther Dyson, who participated in
> > the Senate hearing last week but will *not* be at the House hearing
> > this Wednesday.
> > We may choose to send another, similar letter to the House committee
> > after its testimony is heard. But the one Olivier drafted (the content
> > of which I agree with) needs to go to Mr. Rockefeller and the Senate
> > committee.
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
More information about the NA-Discuss