[NA-Discuss] .GB/gb.com

Mon Aug 8 21:36:36 UTC 2011

Maybe, but ccTLDs should remain in the public interest as originally designed. ICANN cites the "sovereignty" issue for not getting involved but I would argue that sovereignty is lost when it moves to private ownership (not management, of course, but this is a THIN line in some cases).

From: Joly MacFie 
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 4:33 PM
To: Garth Bruen at Knujon.com 
Cc: na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] .GB/gb.com

Wold seem to be a good argument for new TLDs - at least one doesn't stand the risk of abitrary re-delegation.. 

j

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Garth Bruen at Knujon.com <gbruen at knujon.com> wrote:

  by Michele Neylon, concerning some shenanigans with gb.com:

  http://www.internetnews.me/2011/07/30/centralnics-gb-com-in-dispute-gb-com-now-wildcarded/

  ------
  NA-Discuss mailing list
  NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
  https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

  Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
  ------

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
 VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--------------------------------------------------------------
-