[NA-Discuss] On the transparency of ICANN/registrar negotiations

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I support the ALAC sending such a letter of advice to the Board.

Of course having written a blog decrying this situation as a major threat to the ICANN social compact that allows the contracted parties to have a voice in the regulatory instruments, i.e. their contracts, by subjecting their contracts to the community derived policy development processes, my support probably comes as no great surprise.

a.
http://www.circleid.com/posts/registrar_stakeholder_group_gnso_works_against_icann_multistakeholder/

On 22 Apr 2011, at 05:46, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> In advance of Monday's conference, I'd like to call your attention to
> something that I'd like to discuss. This statement will be up for discussion
> at the Tuesday ALAC meeting and I'd like to get NA feedback.
> https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/ALAC+Statement++to+the+ICANN+Board+on+the+RAA+Negotiations+-+April+2011
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> - Evan
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
> 
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
>