[NA-Discuss] On the transparency of ICANN/registrar negotiations

Avri Doria avri at ella.com
Fri Apr 22 07:04:37 UTC 2011


I support the ALAC sending such a letter of advice to the Board.

Of course having written a blog decrying this situation as a major threat to the ICANN social compact that allows the contracted parties to have a voice in the regulatory instruments, i.e. their contracts, by subjecting their contracts to the community derived policy development processes, my support probably comes as no great surprise.


On 22 Apr 2011, at 05:46, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> Hello all,
> In advance of Monday's conference, I'd like to call your attention to
> something that I'd like to discuss. This statement will be up for discussion
> at the Tuesday ALAC meeting and I'd like to get NA feedback.
> https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/ALAC+Statement++to+the+ICANN+Board+on+the+RAA+Negotiations+-+April+2011
> Thanks!
> - Evan
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------

More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list