[NA-Discuss] Stability, Security, and Resilience of the DNS Review Team

Eduardo Diaz eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com
Thu Apr 7 15:23:17 UTC 2011

We believe that DNSSEC should be mandatory for all from day one. If not, the
same problem that .fr had (as it was mentioned in the statement) might
happen with these in the future. Better to verify the system on day one than
later when the effect of a software bug can be felt by many.


On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> wrote:

> Hello NARALOers,
> There is currently an open vote for ALAC members on whether to endorse the
> current statement on the SSR-Team.
> https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Stability%2C+Security%2C+and+Resilience+of+the+DNS+Review+Team+%28SSR-Team%29
> As there was recently some discussion of this on the na-discuss list, I
> would like to find out whether the current version incorporates the views
> that were expressed.
> I note that this statement calls for the new gTLD program to make DNSSEC
> optional rather than mandatory. (There are specific kinds of TLDs for which
> DNSSEC should be mandatory IMO, but that's outside the scope of this
> document)
> I will need to vote soon and would like to know if there are any
> substantial
> problems with the document in its current form according to NARALO members.
> Thanks,
> - Evan
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------

NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only
for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
you have received this communication by error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.

More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list