[NA-Discuss] Operational Plan and Budget for 2009

mcknight.glenn at gmail.com mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
Tue Mar 31 07:55:57 EDT 2009


Hi


I too express concern about the lack of action items for the At Large or  
user constituencies.

As ICANN mentioned various times during the sessions they aim to  
demonstrate with " Transparency"
the following:

"Global engagement and increased international participation"

Since ICANN Is a 501C and "crows' the virtue of public engagement, it  
behooves me that they are not practicing what they speak
I can see the " Public" comments becoming a selective channel of  
communication ie. Registrars only which is not public but more a special  
interest group
lobby for shaping ICANN direction and deliverables.

As we saw during the ECRIME Sessions and especially at Garth's and Rudi's  
session the bias is obvious.

Regards

Glenn


More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list