[NA-Discuss] FW: Draft New gTLD statement

Brendler, Beau Brenbe at consumer.org
Mon Jan 26 10:26:24 EST 2009


Note that I am speaking rather strongly on behalf of NA-RALO here, on the basis of this position as we discussed in our most recent NA conference call.

BB

-----Original Message-----
From: Brendler, Beau
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:25 AM
To: 'Patrick Vande Walle'; Cheryl Langdon-Orr
Subject: RE: Draft New gTLD statement

Thanks, Patrick.

You wrote:

"The Euralo statement includes a sentence that says "ICANN should launch the

process with no further delay."

I leave it up to the chair to decide how to move forward with this now. This statement is in direct opposition to the NA-RALO position and we will not support it. Further, we do not believe consistency with past ALAC statements is a particularly important criteria.

Thanks for sending this.

BB

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Vande Walle [mailto:patrick at vande-walle.eu]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 7:32 AM
To: Brendler, Beau; Cheryl Langdon-Orr
Subject: Re: Draft New gTLD statement


[Taken Nick out of the discussion]  --Patrick



I did not hear strong oppositions from the Euralo community to the draft

gTLD statement that we received yesterday. The Euralo community will

forward to the ALAC a series of comments that it would like to see included

as an appendix to main ALAC comments. I guess the other RALOs may want to

do this, too.



The Euralo statement includes a sentence that says "ICANN should launch the

process with no further delay" and would like to see this statement

included in the main ALAC statement. I am aware some people think the whole

process should be stopped, or at least suspended. On the other hand,

advising ICANN to go forward with the process would certainly be in

continuity of all previous ALAC statements.



Best,



Patrick



















***
Scanned

**
This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.



More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list