[NA-Discuss] Another Joke from Westlake Consulting

[Glenn McKnight]

All
We all have  seen questionable  procurement policies. Normally the
organizations  do not espouse any adherence to transparency and
accountability policies.

Perhaps  a direct meeting with the selection committee on the process to
express concerns on transparency etc.

They need to reveal  provide details on who else submitted proposals,  what
was the selection criteria process., How did the competition stack up? etc


Glenn

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Annette Muehlberg <Annette.Muehlberg at web.de
> wrote:

> no surprise to me.
> remember the paris meeting last year?  i made a statement on the panel,
> that not a single one of my statements found its way into the westlake
> review (and i spent a whole lot of time in interview with and sending
> material and proposals to them).
>
> as i was very much involved in setting up the ralos as the chair of alac,
> tricia said that the board governance committee's alac review working group
> would be very interested in listening to my analysis of structural problems
> of the alac and of staff as well as to my proposals for improvement. as is
> said i would not spent anymore time in online comments, she promised i would
> be called by the alac review working group.
> i have never been called.
>
> best greetings
> annette
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson at GOV.NU.CA>
> > Gesendet: 25.02.09 06:08:15
> > An:  <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> > Betreff: Re: [NA-Discuss] Another Joke from Westlake Consulting
>
>
> > Another thing that has been bothering me about Westlake:
> >
> > I have been asking and asking, since Delhi, about the lack of
> transparency around how Westlake got the contract - especially since they
> applied late when other organizations applied on time - and I have YET to
> receive ANY kind of answer from Tricia Drakes (sp?), anybody on that team,
> or anybody whatsoever.  I keep getting told that they are really, really
> busy and will get back to me shortly...  or after the next meeting... or...
>  or...  It just goes on and on and I still have nothing.
> >
> > This is starting to drive me nuts.  If we cannot expect ICANN to keep to
> their own contracting procedures, what can we expect.
> >
> > D
> >
> > Darlene A. Thompson
> > CAP Administrator
> > Nunavut Department of Education/N-CAP
> > P.O. Box 1000, Sation 910
> > Iqaluit, NU  X0A 0H0
> > Phone:  (867) 975-5631
> > Fax:  (867) 975-5610
> > E-mail:  dthompson at gov.nu.ca
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Danny
> Younger
> > Sent: Tue 2/24/2009 4:01 PM
> > To: na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > Subject: [NA-Discuss] Another Joke from Westlake Consulting
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/rssac/rssac-final-report-24feb09-en.pdf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------
> > NA-Discuss mailing list
> > NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> > Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org <http://www.naralo.org/
> >
> > ------
> >
> >
> > ------
> > NA-Discuss mailing list
> > NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> > Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> > ------
> >
>
> --
>
>
>
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
>



-- 
Glenn McKnight
868 Corbetts Road
Oshawa, Ontario L1K 2E1
905-434-6655
mcknight.glenn at gmail.com
skype  gmcknight
http://newsocialmedia.wordpress.com