[NA-Discuss] Fast flux update

[Brendler, Beau]

I agree with all of this. I will try to reach someone at MAAWG.
________________________________________
From: John L [johnl at iecc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:34 AM
To: Brendler, Beau
Cc: NA Discuss
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Fast flux update

Wearing my CAUCE hat:

Fast flux is a significant abuse enabler, and since it often happens at
the registry level, ICANN is uniquely positioned to deal with it.

We should send a strong message that the GNSO and ICANN should get off
their rear ends and address it.  Registries could easily, e.g., limit DNS
changes to two per day without affecting any legitimate users.

Incidentally fast flux has also gotten a lot of attention at MAAWG, an
international group of ISPs and infrastructure providers of which I'm a
member.  I expect MAAWG would be happy to lend some expertise if asked.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.

***
Scanned

**
This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.