[NA-Discuss] Fast flux update

[Wendy Seltzer]

I believe the at-large public has an interest in the consideration of
fast-flux usage. I do not believe that the charter of this particular
group was well formulated to help that investigation. I'd say that if
ALAC supports re-constitution of a fast-flux working group, we should
urge that it focus precisely on whether and how one might distinguish
between abusive and benign uses of fast-flux techniques.

Thanks,
--Wendy


Brendler, Beau wrote:
> Brief update: It appears this WG has stalled for the foreseeable future. The chairman, Mike O'Connor, has resigned. Avri Doria sent a message this morning telling the participants to await next steps, but the WG had pretty much stalled in process already.
> 
> Bureaucratic processes are not my strong suit, but should the ALAC create a short statement of advisory that we believe this is an important issue, provide some framework and definition, and encourage the GNSO to re-constitute the group?
> 
> Beau

-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
Visiting Professor, American University Washington College of Law
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/