[NA-Discuss] For consideration at the monthly meeting

[Evan Leibovitch]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brendler, Beau wrote:

> This is an interesting idea...worth discussion I think.

If -- as the ALAC review recommends -- it is made more clear what
distinguishes At-Large from NCUC, I don't see why we could not pursue
this. At least it doesn't hurt to ask, and Danny makes a good point
about a hole in the  GNSO's representation.

While it is possible that ALAC can't be in both, NARALO is one step
removed from ALAC and, in both theory and practise from my POV, closer
to the grassroots. For one thing, unlike ALAC, NARALO is not an
exclusive club joinable only by election or appointment. Any org that
meets certain guidelines -- or any individual with even fewer
limitations -- can be involved.

- - Evan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFI4Nt+B6WWYxnsgmwRAkqsAKCdPK6xzs2NPrkYXctjci9yrfhsiwCfRp3B
3L9OtJJKdulWLPsXxcXVvxo=
=HeMs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----