[NA-Discuss] For consideration at the monthly meeting

Danny Younger dannyyounger at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 27 13:26:26 EDT 2008


Alan, you may be right... or not.  At the very least we could have our Chair ask the ICANN General Counsel for an opinion.  



--- On Sat, 9/27/08, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] For consideration at the monthly meeting
> To: "NA Discuss" <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008, 1:17 PM
> I take issue with the statement that the NARALO could
> continue as an 
> At-Large RALO and be a GNSO constituency. I am pretty sure
> that this 
> would be over the line and not acceptable. It would (in my
> opinion) 
> have to be an either-or thing).
> 
> Alan



      



More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list