[NA-Discuss] For consideration at the monthly meeting
Danny Younger
dannyyounger at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 27 13:26:26 EDT 2008
Alan, you may be right... or not. At the very least we could have our Chair ask the ICANN General Counsel for an opinion.
--- On Sat, 9/27/08, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] For consideration at the monthly meeting
> To: "NA Discuss" <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008, 1:17 PM
> I take issue with the statement that the NARALO could
> continue as an
> At-Large RALO and be a GNSO constituency. I am pretty sure
> that this
> would be over the line and not acceptable. It would (in my
> opinion)
> have to be an either-or thing).
>
> Alan
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list