[NA-Discuss] Independance of Westlake Review
Thompson, Darlene
DThompson at GOV.NU.CA
Mon Sep 22 11:35:14 EDT 2008
Hi Tricia,
In Paris you asked me to e-mail you with the details of my concerns with the way in which Westlake was appointed as the ALAC independent reviewer. Here are the points that I was hoping you could address:
As per the attached, the original deadline for the RFP was July 23. In the meetings in Paris, Westlake reported that their proposal was in prior to Aug. 30.
- Why was this deadline re-opened?
- How many bidders were compliant with the original deadline?
- Did Westlake submit their proposal on time?
- Was there an assessment of the original bidders and what was the result of that assessment?
As you can well imagine, these questions directly impact on the “independence” of this review.
Thank you kindly for your time,
Darlene Thompson
(on behalf of N-CAP)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: icann-alac-rfp-20jun07.pdf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 14051 bytes
Desc: icann-alac-rfp-20jun07.pdf
Url : http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20080922/7d00bfdd/attachment.pdf
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list