[NA-Discuss] [ALAC-Internal] Fwd: Re: [ALAC] Statement on Stakeholder Group Openness

[Brendler, Beau]

Related to this topic:

We (the ALAC) needs to act on and ratify the comments on the RAA. Those were supposed to be finalized and to Tim Cole by the end of August. We can't wait now until our monthly ALAC call in October. Maybe this can be a test case where we try to figure out how to move ahead on something.

-----Original Message-----
From: alac-internal-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-internal-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:56 AM
To: ALAC Internal List
Subject: Re: [ALAC-Internal] Fwd: Re: [ALAC] Statement on Stakeholder Group Openness

Generally agree, but I put this note on the internal list to spark some thinking and then have the discussion in a venue where all folks have a reasonable chance of participating in it (which to date is not one of our mailings lists).

Alan

At 10/09/2008 10:28 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>Alan Greenberg wrote:
> > I am putting this post in the closed internal list.
> >
> > I request time in Cairo to have a face-to-face discussion on the
> > types of issues that the ALAC can decide without world-wide
> > consultation, and those IF ANY that, as a duly selected body, it has
> > the authority to do alone, or in consultation with RALO leaders.
>
>If there is some sense of the kinds of issues that are to arise, it is
>possible for us (RALO chairs and secretariats) to at least get a sense
>of the overall direction that the ALSs would collectively prefer on
>such issues. Armed with such a general "mood" but not direction on
>specific motions, I believe it is possible for each RALO's
>representatives (their elected ALAC reps plus the chairs and
>secretariats) to be able to act on issues and motions raised in meetings.
>
>It is reasonable that issues of major substance, as well as those not
>identified (even generally) in advance be sent back for ALS response.
>However, I believe that a significant amount of business can be done if
>the RALOs have been previously surveyed in advance and their views are
>reflected in the actions of their four reps at the meetings.
>
>If the purpose of this process is to create a draft "point of reference"
>that is then sent back for ALS review, that is even better. But the
>timing of some issues may not allow that luxury.
>
>- Evan
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC-Internal mailing list
>ALAC-Internal at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-l
>ists.icann.org
>
>ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
>At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org



_______________________________________________
ALAC-Internal mailing list
ALAC-Internal at atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists.icann.org

ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org

***
Scanned

****************************************************************************
********
SCANNED

****************************************************************************
********