[NA-Discuss] [Fwd: Re: ALAC Agenda]

[Danny Younger]

Hi Wendy,

At least we agree that these amendments should not be blithely agreed to as a package as community members still have significant disagreements over the language of the amendments.

best wishes,
Danny


--- On Mon, 11/24/08, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com> wrote:

> From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>
> Subject: [NA-Discuss] [Fwd: Re:  ALAC Agenda]
> To: "NA Discuss" <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Date: Monday, November 24, 2008, 12:10 PM
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] ALAC Agenda
> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:51:53 -0500
> From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>
> To: dannyyounger at yahoo.com
> CC: Robert Guerra <lists at privaterra.info>, 
> "Brendler, Beau"
> <Brenbe at consumer.org>, Alan Greenberg
> <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>,  NA
> Discuss <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> References:
> <368660.49049.qm at web52208.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
> 
> Danny Younger wrote:
> > Alan,
> > 
> > There are some amendments which are simply not
> acceptable.  Let's consider a specific example cited in
> my own public comments as well as in the comments of the IPC
> and the US DOC:
> > 
> > "Also, Registrar shall either (1) include in the
> database the name and postal address, e-mail address, and
> voice telephone number provided by the customer of any
> privacy service or licensee of any proxy registration
> service offered or made available by Registrar or its
> affiliate companies in connection with each registration or
> (2) display a conspicuous notice to such customers at the
> time an election is made to utilize such
> > privacy or proxy service that their data is not being
> escrowed."
> > 
> > The second clause in this amendment must be eliminated
> as it is antithetical to the interest of all registrants.
> 
> I disagree, speaking as one registrant.  A registrant
> should have the
> option never to have his/her personal information recorded.
>  If that
> means risking losing the name because the information is
> not escrowed,
> that risk option should be the registrant's choice, not
> ICANN's.
> 
> --Wendy
> 
> 
> -- 
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
> Visiting Professor, American University Washington College
> of Law
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/
> 
> 
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------