[NA-Discuss] ALAC Agenda

[Alan Greenberg]

Although not answering any of Danny's questions (but acknowledging 
where were are today with the RAA amendments being punted to the 
GNSO), I do note that as ALAC Liaison, I am taking what I hope will 
be successful action to fast-path the first round of RAA amendments 
through the GNSO and forwarded to the Board for quick approval.

Alan

At 24/11/2008 07:14 AM, Danny Younger wrote:
>Dear North American reps to the ALAC:
>
>The entire point of having a RALO is so that grassroots input may be 
>brought to the attention of the ALAC.  There were several items that 
>I raised that have not made it onto the ALAC Agenda for tomorrow's meeting:
>
>1.  the failure to inaugurate a comprehensive review of registrar 
>accreditation processes
>2.  a request for a formal explanation from ICANN Staff as to why 
>(1) invoking the amendments and waivers clause in the RAA may not be 
>pursued and (2) why an updated RAA agreement may not be substituted. 
>As both of these options are permitted by contract, we need to know 
>why Staff has chosen not to pursue this viable course of action.
>3.  a response to users that have posted comments to the RAA-WG.
>
>As reps for the NARALO you have a duty to raise the issues that have 
>been brought forth by the membership and to place these issues on 
>the agenda if they merit discussion, otherwise there is no point 
>whatsoever in having these RALO structures or an ALAC.
>
>see my orginal comments at
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/2008q4/004938.html
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/2008q4/004939.html
>
>
>
>
>------
>NA-Discuss mailing list
>NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
>Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
>------