[NA-Discuss] [At-Large] GNSO Improvements Statement Edits

[Louis Houle]

So am I. Quite better.

It would be nice to receive it in a «more» readable format. :-)

Louis Houle
ISOC Québec

Evan Leibovitch a écrit :
> Brendler, Beau wrote:
>   
>> I'm closer to supporting this than anything else I've seen yet.
>>
>> Danny, Evan, what do you think (the document is a little difficult to read as it's very wide, I'm referring to Nick's revisions on the right).
>>   
>>     
> It is a massive step in the right direction, specifically in suggesting
> that ALAC may still play a role in GNSO while drafters are aware of its
> flowchart-rewriting consequences.
>
> I hope that there are lessons learned going forward -- certainly
> mistakes were made to get us to this point -- but on the immediate issue
> of "what do we send regarding the GNSO improvements" I like Nick's
> draft. Please -- especially amongst those who took issue with the
> original "final" versions -- if anyone has suggestions to make please
> offer them now.
>
> - Evan
>
>
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
>
>