[NA-Discuss] [Fwd: [ALAC-Internal] FW: Call for Comments on GNSO Domain Tasting Motion ... ACTION Required for RALO's and ALS input]

[Danny Younger]

Let's be clear about something... the Registrar
Constituency's primary argument in favor of retaining
the AGP is for its use as a device within which credit
card fraud may be managed.  At the very least, if we
will be arguing to eliminate the AGP, we should be
offering up an alternative and suitable way to
mitigate Registrar fraud concerns if we hope to arrive
at a consensus-based solution.

The only way that I can think of having this
accomplished is via new language in a Credits Section
within the Service Level Agreement that is part of the
relevant Registry-Registrar Agreement -- see for
example http://www.verisign.com/static/002136.pdf

This, of course, will require cooperation from the
Registries who may not be prone to re-drafting their
agreements.

Does anyone else that is advocating AGP elimination
have any concrete suggestions to deal with the fraud
concerns that can be put on the table?


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ