[NA-Discuss] Draft NARALO statement on ALAC review

[Evan Leibovitch]

Dominik Filipp wrote:
>> that being that a negative response by At-large
>> to the review could endanger the summit being ok'd
>>     
>
> Does it mean if At-Large baby will not be obedient it will be punished?
> If so, I would then fully understand why the ALAC voted as it voted.
>   
I think it is grossly unfair to suggest that most of the people here are
acting this way. Some of the stronger supporters of strong NARALO
naction on this issue have also been key organizers of the Summit.

IMO the Summit is a *necessary* activity of ICANN if it is to prove to
outsiders (and especially the US government)  that it at least is
minimally serious about multi stakeholder involvement. If they can the
Summit because of improper comments by some individuals, well than that
doubly proves that ICANN does not really care about having an educated
and active At-Large. I prefer to stay optimistic until proven otherwise.

- Evan