[NA-Discuss] Summary Minutes NARALO Teleconference 09 June

[Dominik Filipp]

Danny,

A bit sarky view ;-) The fact that the constituencies are doing a more
visible work may be derived from its higher status and their
organizational integration and stability. At-Large is still in progress
and evolution having just advisory voice in result. Therefore I would
not compare who deserves what. However, I have to agree with Evan in
that after the consolidation At-Large, by its organizational nature and
the overall public outreach it is intended to cover, will need more
money than other much smaller constituencies. The consolidation,
however, also means the promotion of At-Large to a body with voting
right.

Dominik
 

-----Original Message-----
From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Danny
Younger
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 4:53 PM
To: At-Large Staff; Evan Leibovitch
Cc: Nick Ashton-Hart; NA Discuss
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Summary Minutes NARALO Teleconference 09 June

Evan,

You are at liberty to make the case that the at-large deserves more
dollars than other constituent bodies.  I would argue that those who do
the work are to be rewarded, while those that accomplish almost nothing
should receive almost nothing.


------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists
.icann.org

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------