[NA-Discuss] [At-Large] Post-Paris Review
Vittorio Bertola
vb at bertola.eu
Wed Jul 16 12:40:49 EDT 2008
Ross Rader ha scritto:
> Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>
> > The apparent staff obsession to fund constituencies that don't need the
> > subsidy, at the expense of those who do, is what I consider worrisome.
>
> I don't see this as a staff push. My slightly uninvolved view is that
> this emanates mostly from the GNSO Council where constituency interests
> contend that their work is so important that they absolutely must have
> travel funding. Perhaps Alan could shed some better light on the issue,
> as I've not been directly involved in the Council for the better part of
> a year.
I think that it is reasonable to conceive travel funding, attached to
specific unpaid positions, as a reward for the commitment an individual
puts into them. I think that this should not be incompatible with other
personal interests being pursued at ICANN meetings, as long as the
position is not directly connected to them. E.g. if I run a registrar
and serve on the GNSO Council, I should not be funded - my employer
should pay. But if I run a registrar and serve on the SSAC, then I
should be funded (and that might make my employer more likely to let me
serve in the position).
There might be people accepting the voluntary positions to get funding
and then come to meetings and look out for future business
opportunities, but I don't see that as an issue as long as the deal
between ICANN (the community) and the individual is fair, i.e. you do
your work well and impartially in your unpaid position as long as you
stay there.
I am personally much more concerned by people getting funded and then
spending most of their time sightseeing or shopping. No idea about how
it's going now, but there were quite a few in past years, up to the
point that specific participation thresholds were developed to be able
to get rid of them.
--
vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <--------
--------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list