[NA-Discuss] registrant advisory committee

[Jacqueline A. Morris]

I think it's *all potential users*. I'd be willing to support an 
initiative to make it VERY clear in the Bylaws.I'd also be willing to 
solicit LACRALO support on this.
Jacqueline

Michael Maranda wrote:
> For the record, I also support John's general view here.     At Large 
> must be definitively inclusive of all Internet users (and perhaps 
> further - all  potential users?) and not in any way restricted to 
> domain registrants.   What current language leaves this ambiguous?  
> What specific changes if any would be required to address the point 
> John raises?   Is there support within NARALO to bring this case to 
> ALAC, and short of ALAC interest, to ICANN directly?------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20080219/e864d4e6/attachment.html