[NA-Discuss] FW: Second Vote on the RAA Package now open

[Evan Leibovitch]

Brendler, Beau wrote:
> I am inclined to vote "yes," as long as we can count on the "with the possibility of further policy development in the future" part. Otherwise, from what I am able to understand, we might lose the good work that's been done on the RAA up to this point.
>   
Any vote like this appears to require some kind of leap of faith, it
seems. As Danny indicates, tougher wording without enforcement is a
sham, but the lack of one does not justify the lack of the other.

I agree on voting yes, as acknowledged partial progress; while a
positive step forward, it still needs significant improvement. It will
be up to Us (in the large sense) to ensure that the "possibility" of
future policy work becomes a reality. The only way we can count on it is
to drive it ourselves.

I agree with Danny that the improvements are incomplete, but also agree
that this is not a reason to turn down the changes on the table.

- Evan