[NA-Discuss] On ALAC response to BGC WG midpoint etc.: How do you want me to vote?

[Evan Leibovitch]

Good morning and happy holidays, everyone.

It was less than a week ago that Beau sent his original message on this
subject to the list. Thanks to his consultation, and some swift response
from NARALO, the ALAC chair has withdrawn the original vote, changed the
wording to remove all references to the Executive. While acknowledging
the role of Internet users in other bodies such as the GNSO, the
response still agrees that ALAC is "the appropriate organisational
channel for the voice and concerns of the individual Internet user in
ICANN process". Personally I'm quite fine with this wording but I know
that Beau, Wendy and maybe others had concerns with it.

My personal opinion is to approve the doc as it is now.

- Evan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ALAC Response to BGC WG Mid-Point	Consultation Report on	the ALAC Review v2.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 217738 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20081222/362bd9e3/attachment-0001.pdf>