[NA-Discuss] New Travel Policy - a symptom
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Thu Aug 14 00:16:04 EDT 2008
Evan and all,
Seems like alot of whining to me. Seems rather obvious that
if we ( INEGroup ) can come up with funding for our members
whom wish to attend to do so, than it is no more difficult for the
ALAC to do so as well. Frankly, I believe ICANN has in this
area been far to kind and considerate to even pay for staff members
traveling expenses.
Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> Alan Greenberg wrote:
> > There have been three business oriented constituencies in ICANN from
> > the start (that is, since constituencies came into being) -
> > Commercial and Business users, ISPs and Intellectual Property.
> I guess my point of view is that the BC and IPC really are one and the
> same. That they were allowed to form as two constituencies, regardless
> of the mechanics of how it happened, still serves to dilute the role of
> the public-interest groups.
>
> >> The fact remains that, even without funding, the business and contracted
> >> communities manage to show up in force at every ICANN meeting.
> >>
> >
> > Not quite accurate. In Delhi (admittedly an extreme case), the
> > business and contracted party constituencies of the GNSO Council were
> > missing 6 of their 15 Councillors. 1 Registry, 2 Registrar, and all
> > three IP. Perhaps one or two of these were for personal reasons, but
> > money was the driver.
> >
> And yet 60% oshowed up, under the most extreme case.
>
> At the other extreme, I'd be curious to know the attendee breakdown last
> year in L.A.
>
> By contrast, how much of At-Large could attend ICANN meetings -- even in
> L.A. -- without funding?
>
> > Surely many of those associated with Internet-driven businesses are
> > at ICANN funded by their employers. But there are others who pay
> > their own way, and who must make up the time away from their
> > businesses (particularly true for some lawyers with firms who worship
> > only billable hours).
> Sorry, but that's not a useful rebuttal. There are significant numbers
> of lawyers and consultants who come to meetings in the hope of landing
> new business, either directly through contacts or indirectly through
> building of career-related expertise. (Since registration is free,
> attending ICANN may be cheaper for some than attending a conventional
> business or academic conference.) Even though they may not be officially
> paid to affect policy, it is still in their direct financial interest
> (and a deductible business expense) to attend. And law firms have been
> known to cut slack to associates' time that, while not billable, can be
> directly attributed to landing new clients.
>
> The number of legal and business reps who attend ICANN without treating
> their trips as a business expense can probably be counted on one hand.
>
> In any case, to me this is more about cutting At-Large resources than it
> is about complaining about other constituencies. If ICANN staff chose to
> elevate the SOs level of travel funding without touching the vision of
> At-Large, I would hardly be so vocal.
>
> - Evan
>
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827
More information about the NA-Discuss
mailing list